When we consider the electronic configuration of Carbon, it has 2 single electrons in two of the three p orbitals. Therefore, shouldn't Carbon obtain a stable octet configuration by forming three covalent bonds using just the orbitals in the 2p subshell? Thus, shouldn't Carbon forms 3 covalent bonds; 2 equal sharing ones and 1 dative?
Since, Carbon makes use of all its valence electrons for bonding, it implies that there must be mixing of the orbitals in the 2s and 2p subshells, which result in an re-ordering such that all the valence electrons are singly placed in orbitals; without any pairing.
This mixing of orbitals is called hybridisation; where two (at least) different types of orbitals are mixed to produce a hybrid. (e.g. an illustration below to show mixing of an s and p orbital producing a hybrid orbital.)
Hybridisation does not come free. In-order to mix the s and p orbital, there must be energy investment which results in the excitation of the electrons and orbitals.
Why would it be favourable for the orbitals be willing to be excited, where the lower the potential energy, the more stable it is? Well, a possible explanation is that the energy used to mix the orbitals is compensated by the energy released from the formation of strong covalent bonds. - [This idea is actually used in the Born Haber cycle.]
In this entry, I will also be taking the opportunity to elaborate more about spacial arrangement of sp2 and sp3 orbitals.
In the mixing to obtain sp3 orbitals, we will have to make use of the s orbital and three p orbitals. Thus, when this is done, we will obtain four sp3 orbitals.
In this entry, I will also be taking the opportunity to elaborate more about spacial arrangement of sp2 and sp3 orbitals.
In the mixing to obtain sp3 orbitals, we will have to make use of the s orbital and three p orbitals. Thus, when this is done, we will obtain four sp3 orbitals.
From the above picture, the angle between two sp3 orbitals is 109.5o . In addition, this orbital can only have head on overlapping, thus allowing the formation of sigma bonds. Hence, this explains why the bond angle in methane is 109.5o. Notice that it is the bigger loop of the hybrid orbital which is used for overlapping (Why?).
While to form sp2 orbital, there is a mixing of the s orbital and two p orbital. Therefore, we will obtain three sp2 orbitals. Leaving one p orbital unmixed with the rest.
While to form sp2 orbital, there is a mixing of the s orbital and two p orbital. Therefore, we will obtain three sp2 orbitals. Leaving one p orbital unmixed with the rest.
The arrangement of the three sp2 orbitals and the p orbital is that the former lies on the same plane at a angle of 120o separating the orbitals. While, the latter is found perpendicular to the plane where the sp2 orbitals lies. The spacial orientation of the these orbital allows for three sigma bonds and one pi-bond to be formed.
Lastly, the sp orbtials is formed by mixing one s orbital and one p orbital. Leaving two p orbitals not mixed. The sp orbitals are found on the same plane while the p orbitals are found perpendicular to this plane.
Therefore, more often than not, multiple bonds are formed due to hybridisation has occurred. Although, one should be mindful about considering whether the bond energy released is sufficient to compensate the energy requirement to mix orbitals.
In this article, we have basically touched about mixing of s and p orbitals only. There are other examples where there is mixing of s, p and d orbitals, but this is beyond our current scope.
In conclusion, hybridisation theory can also be used to supplement what is known from VSEPR. It aids in the explanation of the bond angles which we observed. Thus, with the knowledge of hybridisation theory, it helps to reconcile the knowledge we have from "Atomic Structure" and "Chemical Bonding".
Lastly, the sp orbtials is formed by mixing one s orbital and one p orbital. Leaving two p orbitals not mixed. The sp orbitals are found on the same plane while the p orbitals are found perpendicular to this plane.
Therefore, more often than not, multiple bonds are formed due to hybridisation has occurred. Although, one should be mindful about considering whether the bond energy released is sufficient to compensate the energy requirement to mix orbitals.
In this article, we have basically touched about mixing of s and p orbitals only. There are other examples where there is mixing of s, p and d orbitals, but this is beyond our current scope.
In conclusion, hybridisation theory can also be used to supplement what is known from VSEPR. It aids in the explanation of the bond angles which we observed. Thus, with the knowledge of hybridisation theory, it helps to reconcile the knowledge we have from "Atomic Structure" and "Chemical Bonding".
-- -- -- -- --
Article written by Kwok YL 2009.
Disclaimer and remarks:
- If you would like to use this source, kindly drop me a note by leaving behind a comment with your name and institution. I am all for sharing as the materials on this blog is actually meant for the education purpose of my students.
- This material is entirely written by the author and my sincere thanks will be given to anyone who is kind, generous and gracious to point out any errors.
hello mr kwok
ReplyDeleteis the reason behind why bonding occurs at the bigger loop because the larger loop of the sp orbital has a higher possibility of having the electron since it has a larger electron cloud density?
Hallo Belinda!
ReplyDeleteWell done. You are right. The shape of the orbital indicates to us where is the region where there is high electron density.
Covalent bonding requires atomic orbitals to overlap (i.e as you have seen for signma and pi bonds formation). - Thus allowing sharing of electrons.
Therefore, in the sp3 orbital, the bigger loop has a higherelectron density, thus it is used for bonding.